Advertisement

November 23, 2006

Analysis of an Emily Dickinson poem

I felt a funeral in my brain,
And mourners, to and fro,
Kept treading, treading, till it seemed
That sense was breaking through.

And when they all were seated,
A service like a drum
Kept beating, beating, till I thought
My mind was going numb.

And then I heard them lift a box,
And creak across my soul
With those same boots of lead,
Then space began to toll

As all the heavens were a bell,
And Being but an ear,
And I and silence some strange race,
Wrecked, solitary, here.

And then a plank in reason, broke,
And I dropped down and down--
And hit a world at every plunge,
And finished knowing--then--

Here’s a poem by Emily Dickinson that might interest you. It supposedly describes her/a descent into madness (widely debated as to whether or not she was actually psychotic for a time). Emily is always trickier to “get” than most people think from reading her birds and flowers poems, this being one of the more difficult ones. Starting at stanza 1, I read “funeral” as “disturbance” or “breakdown” if you will, some sort of mental anguish or ending, and “sense” as rationality or reason, sanity, that is. So the first stanza seems to me to be saying that she/the narrator (not necessarily Emily, as one forgets) felt that there was a “fatal disturbance” in her brain, ie something dire wrong with it, and that “mourners” or the agent(s) of the disturbance -- anxiety, worries, symptoms of any and all sorts -- kept yanging and yanging ("treading, treading"...and treading and treading) until it felt as if she was going insane, felt that sanity was breaking through her brain -- see last stanza -- and being lost.

Finally the treading stopped but the pounding drum started until her mind felt totally numb, so that she had neither thought, reason, nor feelings. What was the drum? Her heart beating? The sound of the blood rushing into her ears? And the service, a funeral service surely. But why? To commemorate her? Why then the awful pounding? More like a judge and jury...Or a stern pastor throwing the Book of Judgment at her (Emily was known to have refused to become a true believer).

Then, as the insanity progressed, her mind began truly to die, as the figure of a coffin and boots of lead creaking "across my soul" and space beginning to toll - death knell - suggest (all figurative, nothing literal or specific). The picture is of pall bearers carrying a coffin across a creaky wooden floor while the whole of the space begins to vibrate with sound. But then we realize we are actually situated inside Emily's skull, in her brain, and understand the figure is a metaphor for the same "brain death" or madness she fears.

In the fourth stanza, the death knell rings in space as if all the heavens were a bell and "Being but an ear". What is this? A being is only an ear to hear the bell? Or Emily is but an ear? Or is it that the heavens are actually an ear and not a bell? Difficult to know how to read that line. But in any event, she and silence, “some strange race,” alien to Being and to the heavens, is left here, “wrecked (and) solitary.” A vivid and accurate image of how awful you feel in madness: wrecked, destroyed, pulverized yet alone.

FINALLY, as the last blow, the last floorboard of her brain breaks through (some say the "plank" is over a precipice, and she is on it, but I think this figure hearkens back to the mourners “treading” and “sense breaking through”). She, that is, her sanity, herself, is on the plank, and down she drops, descending as they say, into complete madness or decompensation...She drops down and down, and "hit a world at every plunge." This makes me think that she would hit a "world" and stop, then fall again, and hit and stop, then plunge again. Not sure what the "worlds" she hits are...Memories? Episodes in her past that make up whole worlds? I feel this in any event, this plunging and hitting, plunging and hitting. I feel myself strike my face as I fall on it each time, hit my head, then plummet again into the darkness. It feels terrifying, just terrifying...

And "finished knowing -- then--"...She is essentially dropped into a world of such insanity that she doesn’t know her own or old self, is unconscious, senseless, and completely mad. She has finished knowing could also imply though that she has no more rationality but only emotionality, that this is how she must approach the world from now on, from her feelings... Welp...Anyhow, finally the “—then—” , that unfinished sentence with the incomplete punctuation suggests that the madness hasn’t ended when the poem was written, even though the word "then" implies that it is in the past. Sort of leaves it up in the air: Is she or isn't she?

This is my analysis of the poem. Interested in another's take on it, I sent a version of it to Kate K, who graciously wrote out her own analysis. She did such a terrific job that I want to publish it here, without getting her permission first. (Forgive me Kate, but you didn't answer my e-mail fast enough!!!) BD

Kate wrote:

The more I read this poem, the more I appreciate it.

First stanza: The poet writing " I felt a funeral in my brain" is like saying "I felt a death in my brain" but who are the mourners? Parts of herself that tread so restlessly as to make sense break through her brain, somewhere out of reach?

Second stanza: There is no respite, the mourners (parts of her own mind) settle down but then there begins " A service like a drum". There is no preacher, no sermon, no words, no sense, just the throbbing of a drum. A drum so insistent that her mind goes numb. The image/sound of a drum makes me think of Native Americans, a more primitive, sacred ritual than a Christian church service which would more likely employ an organ with complex music. A drum also makes me think of a heart beat, but here instead of the heart dying (its last beats heard before the silence), it's the brain dying by going numb.

Third stanza: "And then I heard them lift a box" which probably represents the coffin or what is holding the brain (mind). "And creak across my soul" Does the box creak or is it the mourners who creak, the mourners who are like an elaboration on the coffin? Something which still holds her soul. The image of the leaden boots recalls the "treading, treading" as well as the "beating, beating", repetitious and implacable. Lead also makes me think of bullets, something potentially violent and death inducing. "Then space began to toll"-- Does she mean, then space began to take its toll, to cause more damage? The mourners recede and the empty space comes forward, stripping her mind.

Fourth stanza: "As all the heavens were a bell," So the bell tolls as you said like a death knell, a mournful sound but heaven is a bell, joyful music "And Being but an ear" and people are the receivers of the music of heaven. " And I and silence some strange race" She, with her dying/disturbed brain is now part of the silence and space of a kind of hell. She is now part of "some strange race" and no longer connected to heaven. She is outside of heaven. "Wrecked, solitary, here." I found two pertinent definitions of wrecked from the computer dictionary: "1. the disorganized remains of something that has suffered damage or destruction. 2. a person whose physical or mental health or strength has failed." Both imply a breakdown of matter and spirit. And in being a wreck she becomes useless and solitary, again a reference to the absence of heaven which is union with the divine. She says she is "here" but in the state she's in here, in the absence of heaven is a kind of hell or at least limbo, empty and undefined, a kind of prison.

Fifth stanza: "And then a plank in reason, broke"--back to wood, the mourners treading on wood, the box (coffin) made of wood, and then a piece of reason "broke" making the floor of reason no longer serviceable, no longer able to hold the weight of her mind. Plank also means: "2. a fundamental point of a political or other program." So plank can be seen as not just a physical representation of reason but a point of reason that breaks (down). "And I dropped down and down--" The floorboards of reason, of the funeral home break and her soul drops down and down, again break-down, to fall, to lose one's reason, to fall from grace into limbo or hell. "And hit a world at every plunge." She does not write "hit the world" but "a world" as if she's falling down through a series of worlds and not just falling but plunging, which is much more dire. "And finished knowing--then--" And that was the end of her mind, her brain, the final descent into death, into ending, she "finished knowing", all goes blank "then--" I think she leaves the then--open-ended intentionally, leaving open the idea of life after the death of the brain as well as that is probably how most of us end, in almost mid-sentence, abrubtly.

Excellent choice of poem Pam. I had fun with this. My perspective on mental illness is different from Emily Dickinson's in that I don't see it as a form of death, a death that blocks out all light and sound (heaven) but more as a hyper/distorted state of being, especially paranoia. It's not too little I received when I was most psychotic, but too much, an overload of images and ideas and voices causing pain and confusion. To me it was, in part, a form of torture. I was not numb but all too aware. The numbness came later after the trauma. Now I am more numb and, not surprisingly, in less pain, less crazy though still weird in some of my thoughts. Emily Dickinson's take on mental illness is so final, with no sight of a reprieve whereas I think in most mental illness there is some hope, even if it's just a sliver. Not always, I've had my share of hopeless times when I wanted to cease living to end the pain I was feeling but usually there was something to hold onto. What do you think?
-----------------------------------------

Hmmm, what do I think? I think that Emily wasn't numb at all, but tortured and tormented just as we all have been. She thought her mind was going numb, that is that it was being dulled into submission by the pounding of the drum. But in fact everything after that suggests that it did not go numb. As I said, that hitting a world with every plunge image is so painful for me that I cannot help but think that she was suffering immensely. Someone who is numb doesn't care and wouldn't notice if she were "some strange race" or "wrecked, solitary, here." She might even welcome it. As for the finality of her vision of "mental illness" or madness, for one thing, in her day it was in fact often hopeless: there was neither cure NOR treatment of any sort of efficacy. If she'd known someone who was mad, and it is more than likely she had, since if there were hospitals for the insane then, no one wanted their relatives there, in those horrendous conditions, she grew up with the reality of the madwoman in the attic, the addled relative who lived all his or her life at home, being cared for by family.

I myself have OFTEN felt a finality with this illness, and way too often have tried to end it. I have lost hope for myself many times, and have had to rely on others' hope or on forcible measures -- hospitals -- to keep me safe until hope is restored. So I can appreciate the lack thereof in this poem. It is not easy to keep hope alive when you are psychotic, not for me, not as many times as I have relapsed. I have often felt that were it to happen one more time, that would be it, I would be "outta here" for good. But of course, that was the relapse itself speaking, which is what made it doubly dangerous. Hope is best, naturally, and essential, if you can hold on to it; I'm just saying that not everyone can all the time.

If anyone would like to add their 2¢ or 10$ to this discussion, either on the poem itself or on the presence or absence of hope in MI -- do you think it is always there or not -- please add your comments. You self-conscious, shy and lacking in self-esteem readers, puleeze! Remember that I think I'm pondscum too...so if I can put myself out here like this, with negative self-esteem, why can't you? Has ANYONE ever jumped on a commenter here for saying something, anything at all? I promise that if anyone ever flames someone, or even comments derisively about another person, I will delete that comment immediately! So c'mon, you guys, screw up your nerve (am I that scary???) and take the plunge. You might even find it is fun, telling us what you think!

Posted by pamwagg at November 23, 2006 04:42 PM

Comments

Hi all,

I've been looking at Emily's biography for information about headaches and/or madness...and on-line it has been frustrating but I have found some reports of an episode of "nervous prostration" one summer it was, I believe. None of suffering headaches. One article attested to the theory that she was at least suffering from seasonal affective disorder and another that she was mildly bipolar. Nothing suggested schizophrenia. So take that for whatever it's worth. I would caution everyone, however, to remember that just as in my own poems, the speaker is NOT always Emily herself. She takes on personas frequently. In one poem she even writes "when [I was] a boy"! So writing about madness or headaches, she may in fact be using her imagination only, or writing from someone else's viewpoint, just as I did with the mother of the suicide bomber.

Just something to keep in mind.

Pam

Posted by: Pam W at November 27, 2006 06:05 PM

Yes, Pam, there is always hope. It takes courage to face the illness head-on. Yet I believe the diagnosis can be liberating. We can't go back to the way things were, but we can decide to accept things and move on. In April, I turn 42, and I'm convinced my life is better than it ever was. This despite the ongoing struggle, and deluge of self-doubt.

It can never be the same. We can't go back to the way things were before. Yet if we accept the truth, we can indeed accomplish something and make our lives better.

Peace,
Christina

Posted by: Christina Bruni at November 25, 2006 09:04 PM

Dear Pam,
The interpretation was mine alone. I saw such similarity in her use of repetition to the repeated assaults of my own headaches, I simply hypothesized that my view of her intent would not be out of the question. I did state that my interpretation would probably not stand up to a biographical or expert poetic analysis, but one thing that is carved in stone in the deepest convolutions of my brain, is that unless the artist has specifically indicated his or her intent, then any plausible interpretation cannot be completely discounted. During my years spent wracking my brain to present numerous professors with my own,unresearched interpretation of the "hidden meaning"(it went without saying that great literature could not possibly be taken literally) of countless works, my prior assertion was a challenge I gave myself. The highest compliment I ever received came from a visiting professor from Oxford with whom I studied the Romantic poets. Commenting upon a long paper I had written interpreting many long and admitttedly difficult poems, he wrote,"You have cited no references. Can these interpretations possibly be exclusively your opinion? If so, and I believe it to be so, I applaud your incredible efforts, and reward you with a well deserved A+." I know this sounds like I'm bragging, but you know that is not within my landscape. I burst into tears of relief that I did not receive an F for lack of references. Timothy Chillcotte was my professor's name and I cherish everything he gave to me. I think I really got off track, but if you followed my ramblings, you will see that I answered your question.(I think). Thank you for saying that my comment at least gave you food for thought.
Respectfully submitted,Your old ET

Posted by: Paula Kirkpatrick at November 25, 2006 08:58 PM

Hiya,

What great interpretations! I will hold my judgment on whether or not the funeral is a headache/migraine, though I have not read of Emily suffering them. She died in her late 50s (?) of Bright's disease, which today would be considered acute or chronic nephritis or kidney inflammation -- characterized by edema, oligouria or reduced urine output, fever and backache, but not headache. She is known to have suffered from depression however. But because the idea is so terrific and fits the poem so well I'd almost buy the headache thing, had I not already convinced myself of another interpretation. But I must say, this is very fresh -- I need a new word -- and novel (to me at any rate) and one I'd not heard before. ET, is it an idea that is batted around, or simply something you and Yaya came up with de novo so to speak? Do you know? As I said, GREAT interpretation. Gave me something to think about!

Posted by: Me at November 25, 2006 02:07 PM

Hi Pam,

Here is my 1 cent input on the Emily Dickenson's poem. I’ve had my share of struggling with clinical depression so I am a little familiar with emotional anguish and suffering but in my humble opinion I don’t think Emily Dickenson is describing her descent into madness, at least not this time.

What this poem sounds like to me is someone who is suffering from migraine headaches. I have a favorite aunt who struggles with migraines. She once described them to me.

When Emily Dickenson writes “I felt a funeral in my brain” I think she is describing a migraine coming on and the headache is coming on at a certain rhythm or speed as she write the second, third and fourth stanza

And mourners, to and fro,
Kept treading, treading, till it seemed
That sense was breaking through

Emily goes on to further describe the steady march of her migraine in “And when they all were seated.” My understanding of a migraine is that it will come on sometimes very slowly and rhythmically and then the physical symptoms of pain, the sound of your veins full of too much blood pumping through her veins until she was unable to think of nothing more than pain as Ms Dickenson describes in

A service like a drum
Kept beating, beating, till I thought
My mind was going numb.

My aunt’s migraines forced her into submission to what was going on in her head and also in her gut when nausea and vomiting came -----as Emily Dickenson describes ---

And then I heard them lift a box,
And creak across my soul
With those same boots of lead,
Then space began to toll

As the pain increased my aunt’s thinking and reasoning disappeared into a very dark and quiet room where she would lay for hours.

As all the heavens were a bell,
And Being but an ear,
And I and silence some strange race,
Wrecked, solitary, here.

Aunt Bertie stayed in her room for hours in her darkened and silent room until she felt the pain leave ever so slowly “And finished knowing – then—“

And then a plank in reason, broke,
And I dropped down and down--
And hit a world at every plunge,
And finished knowing--then--


Regards,
Yaya

Posted by: yaya at November 24, 2006 03:15 PM

Dear Pam,
I found your analysis to be fascinating and convincing. Kate's analysis was equally insightful. Since I have been unmasked and my former profession as an English teacher revealed, I hope you can understand that it takes a great deal of courage for me to express my opinion of Miss Dickinson's state of mind at the time she wrote this particular piece or to speculate on its "meaning". I have found again and again that so much is expected of an English teacher that I dearly wish I could have maintained my ambiguous identity. Howver, since Emily has always been an artist whose work I admired and respected, and because it was with her words that you publicly offered me your beautiful olive branch, I cannot remain silent on this one. With a deep breath, I will forge ahead with my humble opinion which differs considerably from yours and Kate's.
What I hear in this poem is a very real expression of Emily's pain. I actually mean physical pain, not psychic pain. Emily was known to suffer from debilitating headaches, not the typical Victorian woman's "vapors", but the real thing. I am very familiar with the reality of that pain because I too suffer frequently from this scurge. To me, there is no pain that equals that of the agony of severe headaches. It was just that that brought me to my knees, caused me to abandon my students to a substitute, and kept me effectively bedridden for over six months. Therefore, my analysis of this poem is that Emily is symbolically endeavoring to create the pounding, pounding, treading, treading, falling, falling horror that comes upon her with each new assault, rendering her helpless to even think, let alone write, while she is "down,down,down", drowning in her own physical agony. The paranoia one feels upon reading her poem is just what she is experiencing. She fears that she has lost the ability to write forever in the face of the pain, the pain, the pain. I am reminded of Kurt in Joseph Conrad's"Heart of Darkness". His famous words,"Oh, the horror of it," echo Emily's words which are enigmatic and certainly open to numerous interpretation. I have given you mine. It can be refuted on both poetic and biographical levels, but I feel that I too have lived through what Emily so skillfully says, but does not say, and thus my opinion, though certainly personalized far too much to be considered a true analysis of the poem is the most meaningful opinion that I can share. Whew! Am I glad that's over!
Rushing in again, where those angels fear
to tread, Your Paula(I really wasn't an ET)

Posted by: Paula Kirkpatrick at November 24, 2006 12:53 PM

Dear Pam,

Thanks for including my interpretation of Emily Dickinson's poem. It is such a pleasure to feel responsive to a good poem. It makes me value words all the more and appreciate those who've come before and those who are here now trying to translate their experiences for a wider audience.

Of course, you are perfectly right to identify with Emily Dickinson. In the throes of mental illness it is a final and hopeless feeling and numbness is involved as a reaction to all kinds of trauma. And I also agree that she does not come across as numb at all but (again) all too aware of how her mind is deteriorating into space and nothingness. This must have been pure horror for someone so perceptive, intelligent and sensitive. But what is wonderful is that she lived to tell about it and more, so somewhere there must have been some hope for her to hold onto. At least, I hope so.

Hey what do the rest of you think?

Posted by: Kate K. at November 24, 2006 01:28 AM

Post a comment

Please enter this code to enable your comment -
Remember Me?